No Way Out Full Movie Free Download

No Way Out Full Movie Free Download >> DOWNLOAD (Mirror #1)

a5c7b9f00b In Washington, the Defense Secretary David Brice has a political dispute with Senator William &#39;Billy&#39; Duvall about the project of a submarine. He asks his advisor Scott Pritchard to invite the Navy Lieutenant Commander Tom Farrell, who has become a national hero after rescuing a sailor during a storm, to join his team. Farrell meets Susan Atwell in a party and they have a torrid love affair. Farrell Learns that Susan is Brice&#39;s mistress but he falls in love with her. They spend a weekend together and when they return to Susan&#39;s apartment, Brice rings the bell. The upset Farrell leaves the apartment and sees Brice waiting for Susan. Brice has an argument with Susan and pushes her from the balcony. She falls on a glass table and dies. Brice panics and reports the accident to Pritchard. However, the Machiavellian chief of staff accuses the imaginary Soviet mole Yuri of murdering Susan. Farrell is assigned to lead the investigations to find the identity of Yuri, and gets in serious situation with the presence of witnesses of his weekend with Susan and the regeneration of a Polaroid photo that was found in Susan&#39;s apartment. David Brice, the Secretary of Defense is feuding with a powerful Senator over a project that Brice wants to discontinue which the Senator wants to push through and Brice knows that the Senator will the Director of the CIA whom he has in his pocket to get an edge on Brice. So Brice has Tom Farrell a Naval Intelligence officer assigned to him to help combat the Director. Farrell upon arriving in Washington hooks up with Susan Atwell a woman whom he had a brief liaison with when he was in Washington a few months ago. He doesn&#39;t know that Atwell is Brice&#39;s mistress as well. When Brice learns that she&#39;s been seeing someone else kills her. Now to find the man she&#39;s been seeing so that he could not tell anyone about her and Brice, Scott Pritchard, Brice&#39;s confidant suggests that they claim that Yuri, a Russian spy whom some people believe is an urban legend killed her. So the search commences, Farrell tries to find a way to get Brice to stop the search before they find him cause he knows Pritchard plans to kill the guy when they find him. I didn&#39;t see this when it came out in 1987 which is just as well because I really enjoyed seeing it the other night. It&#39;s a political thriller with Gene Hackman as David Brice, U.S. Secretary of Defense. Brice employs the kind of political machinations usually seen in corrupt congresspersons as he tries to wiggle his way out of a terrible jam. At his side is the particularly sleazy sociopathic Scott Pritchard (Will Patton) who defends his boss with true devotion.<br/><br/>Okay what makes this so good? I mean Sean Young is to die for pretty of course and Kevin Costner is just the kind of guy few women can resist. So we&#39;ve got good eye candy, but what makes &quot;No Way Out&quot; head and shoulders above almost all other thrillers is the oh so ingenious plot. Yes the plot in this movie is very clever—some might say too clever, especially the ending which some viewers may feel is unlikely or tacked on. It is a doozy of an ending and it follows some mesmerizing twists and turns along the way. I found most of them plausible, and I think the only thing wrong with the ending was Kevin Costner&#39;s accent! The screen play was adapted from Kenneth Fearing&#39;s novel &quot;The Big Clock&quot; which I haven&#39;t read. There was also a movie with the same title from 1948 starring Ray Milland, Maureen O&#39;Sullivan, and Charles Laughton. I do know that while &quot;No Way Out&quot; is about the Pentagon and the intrigue centers around the secretary of defense and a naval officer, Commander Tom Farrell (Costner) &quot;The Big Clock&quot; was about a publishing tycoon. Apparently what is the same is some kind of similar action removed from the backdrops.<br/><br/>I find most thrillers have too many plot holes and implausibilities while relying too heavily on action and chase scenes, car crashes, etc. Here most of the chase scenes are on foot. What made me decide to take a look at this was to see the young Sean Young again. Who could forget all the close-ups of her face in &quot;Blade Runner&quot; (1982).<br/><br/>By the way, the title &quot;No Way Out&quot; is especially apt since it really does look like neither Brice nor Farrell have any way out. The plot is that diabolical.<br/><br/>--Dennis Littrell, author of &quot;Dennis Littrell&#39;s True Crime Companion&quot; I&#39;ve just hauled this off the shelf and watched it for the umpteenth time. Flawed though it is, I love it. The controversy amid reviewers is surprising to me; but perhaps I don&#39;t watch sufficient &quot;thrillers&quot; to have a list of expectations--which several folks seem to have found unfulfilled. <br/><br/>Spoilers: &quot;No Way Out&quot; is composed of one surprise after another...a series of surprises, if you will. From learning that Tom and Susan&#39;s original meeting was contrived by others to the shock of her murder, to the reappearance of the forgotten Polaroid negative, to the murder of the IT man and the final scene, with its suspense-filled last scene, I--as a repeat viewer--was constantly aware of Tom&#39;s reaction to every incident in the light of what the ending revealed to us....as well as what it did not. The last line, &quot;let him go. He&#39;ll be back. He has nowhere else to go&quot; is so poignant.<br/><br/>This is very early Costner. The work of a business administration major who suddenly decided he wanted to act. The subtleties in what I understand was only his second performance are astonishing. If you didn&#39;t like it, forget it. but if you did, I strongly recommend watching it at least three times. Good performances from a strong cast and paranoid plotting enough to keep even the staunchest of remake nay-sayers quiet. Hitchockian production with a modern twist.